The BNP, in terms of raw votes, actually got slightly less than in 2005 (as people stayed away from the polls due to the expenses scandal, which may even have helped the big parties due to split votes for the fringe parties). Percentage-wise however, they were at 6.2%. UKIP blasted past Labour into second place and in recent months, small fringe parties such as the English Democrats have gained a bit of traction themselves.
But what exactly are The Left doing about it? Very little. They've tried the name calling approach to stop people voting right of centre (shout “racist” at the bad man who votes UKIP). That evidently hasn't worked. They persevere with that using new vocabulary that nobody understands and furrowing their brows as a means to attempt to psyche people back into voting Labour, Tory, Lib Dem or anyone else considered to be fairly similar to The Establishment in outlook (mass immigration is good. Sending criminals to prison is bad. Green tax is good. Helping the big banks whilst pretending to be socialist, etc).
It's plain to see they have run out of ideas as to how to win votes for themselves, so they just try to lose votes for anyone else. Voting BNP is a vote for fascism. Even voting UKIP is a vote for xenophobia. So what could be causing all this? It's easy to say that The Left have no ideas, but it's truer to say they have plenty of ideas – just none that anyone likes.
So they propagate the fear factor. Vote for UKIP if you want a lifetime of unemployment because no European businesses will let us play with their toys anymore. Vote BNP for having your ethnic minority friends kicked out and sent home (I personally don't see how that's workable for people brought up in this country, but the BNP can spin as can Labour, and can indeed be spun about by Labour). Vote English Democrat and have “your” council scaled down, meaning they can't deal with “your” issues anymore (and how Baby P must have thanked Haringey for their profligacy).
The Establishment need a percentage of people to vote for the likes of the BNP as if there was no evidence of racial tension, the quangos would be out of jobs. And people working in quangos vote for the people that are most likely to keep them in jobs. It's a circular reference. They need people to vote UKIP as an excuse to keep us in Europe. We won't bow down to xenophobia and anti European views, they tell us.
The Left need people to vote for parties they don't agree with because they then twist it into a non existent prejudice as a means to impose sanctions. To watch us. To make new laws and to kill off the last remaining semblances of freedom of speech that they tell us hasn't been curtailed at all. But as usual they'll take it too far, as they haven't reckoned on various factions of the right joining up and forming a larger movement.
There are parts of the so called “far right” (who very often aren't far right at all) who despite not liking each other now, will soon realise that they are too small and too insignificant to pull up any trees on their own, and will reluctantly start talking about forming allegiances on certain issues. It'll only be to further the agendas of each small faction at first, but that won't be the end of it. Not by a long shot.
UKIP don't really need any friends because they've got nothing to hide, barring the odd dodgy expense claim just like the others. They're not at all radical, just traditional. People in the know (i.e. not indoctrinated by the BBC and Guardian) know that there's nothing prejudiced or dangerous about UKIP. The idea of a stable form of conservatism is one that appeals to many. All they really need to do is start funding candidates at home as opposed to channelling all their money into European elections and they'd probably pick up a few.
The BNP need friends. They're trying to pretend that they don't, but they're playing a careful game. Basically, whenever the BNP “bans” something, such as their members being part of the EDL, it talks up the EDL. I'd be willing to put money on the fact that in a couple of years time, that ban will be quietly lifted. The EDL aren't a political organisation, and in my opinion are a perfectly valid organisation (just a small one), but any publicity is good publicity. I'd bet that the BNP are merely trying to build the profile of the EDL as the legitimate organisation that they are, in order to join forces with them later on once they've gained some momentum. They are creating their own allies.
Meanwhile, in the world of Leftist utopia, they don't see this. People fit neatly into categories. Tory voters don't agree with Labour voters and UKIP voters don't agree with BNP voters and BNP voters don't agree with the EDL. That's it. Final. But as is the case when many different factions are universally opposed to one dominant force, these guys will find some common ground, even if they end up shafting each other once the fur starts to fly and they all start gaining ground individually.
Much as the government needs people to continue smoking in order to cash in on the duty, they need people to vote for parties like the BNP in order to exercise greater control, create more quangos, call more people “far right” and ultimately use this totally manufactured prejudice as a means to control more. Tax more. Naturally, it then spreads. There aren't enough BNP voters to justify these things, so it slips down to moderate organisations like the EDL. Then even more moderate parties like UKIP. Soon it'll be the Tories.
Name calling is still rife, but it has changed as the old words and insults don't work anymore. But much as it's been the case that people who've been labelled BNP supporters for years have then gone on to join the BNP (what's the point of NOT joining them, if people will call you BNP anyway), the same will happen with the EDL, with UKIP, with the English Democrats, and possibly even the Tories.
I don't think mass immigration is for today. I think it's for in 20 years time. I think it's for when the so-called “far right” have got a grip, shattered everyone's liberties and clamped down on the free for all on British benefits – including those who need them most, and genuinely. I think it's for when people who've come in during the profligate years have bred in suitable numbers and, in combination with the remaining public sector employees, can win a new landslide vote for The Left and keep them in power for decades to come after that. It's the only conclusion I can come to for the current and continued behaviour of The Establishment, besides their profitable vested interests. They know they're on their way out, but only to be replaced by another bunch more or less the same.
The most interesting election will be in 2 elections time. Once the Tories have had a term and done nothing, people will look for a somewhat more conservative alternative. The form of conservatism may be different, but conservative it will be in one way or another.
There are too many immigrants coming in. There are too many people claiming benefits. There are too many people committing crimes and getting away with it. There are too many British born individuals being abandoned and held to ransom by gang culture. The Left rely on saying they're going to do something about it all when they have no intention of it. They need thuggery, prejudice, hatred and loathing. Conservative types don't.
But as The Left go through their death throes, which they will do a few years from now. It'll be both intriguing yet terrifying to see how much damage they've actually done. Enoch Powell was right when he alluded to the fact there would be rivers of blood. I hope there aren't. I hope they only blood I see is the blood of those stupid, corrupt, self serving people who did this to Britain. And I hope I see it soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment